Keltham is not usually a fan of declaring things illegal for everybody with no exceptions or competence tests, but it sounds like this is way above the danger threshold for being illegal compared to several other things that Keltham has been told are or ought to be illegal.  Is there a story about why this isn't already illegal, given that, apparently, women owning their own stuff is illegal, which Keltham would have thought was much less dangerous than alcohol?

Keltham is not usually a fan of declaring things illegal, but it sounds like this is way above the danger threshold for being illegal compared to several other things that Keltham has been told are or ought to be illegal without any exceptions or competence tests.  Is there a story about why this isn't already illegal without a competence test, given that, apparently, women owning their own stuff is illegal, which Keltham would have thought was much less dangerous than alcohol?