"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law and that exactly which occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"Just remember, if you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be Lawful for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and sort of grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug, and if you don't have the skill to evaluate that then you should really back off the whole thing and leave destroying the universe to somebody else."

"But, again, somebody does have to be willing to do that on some occasions or mysteriously you'll find entities all over the place that want to destroy the universe unless you pay them five gold.  It can be the gods' job but it's got to be someone's.  Which I'm comfortable saying because that makes total intuitive sense to me."

"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law, and that exactly which occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"Just remember, if you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be Lawful for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and sort of grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug, and if you don't have the skill to evaluate that then you should really back off the whole thing and leave destroying the universe to somebody else."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others, "everyone here should just not destroy the universe period until you're much much much better at Law to the point where you can just ignore everything I say.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law, and that exactly which occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"Just remember, if you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be Lawful for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and sort of grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug, and if you don't have the skill to evaluate that then you should really back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, to the point where you can just ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law, and that exactly which occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"Just remember, if you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be Lawful for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, to the point where you can just ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"Just remember, if you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be Lawful for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, to the point where you can just ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"If you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be quote Lawful unquote for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, to the point where you can just ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am kind of getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"If you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be quote Lawful unquote for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, and can be very sure that you're correct to just ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Instinctive high-precision use of Law in particular.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"If you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be quote Lawful unquote for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, and can be very sure that you're correct to just ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Instinctive high-precision use of Law in particular.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"If you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be quote Lawful unquote for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, and can be very sure that you're correct to ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Instinctive high-precision use of Law in particular.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to Lawfully hunt down somebody and kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"If you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be quote Lawful unquote for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, and can be very sure that you're correct to ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."

"I am getting a nervous sense here that I may have jumped too far ahead of your background mastery of Law.  Instinctive high-precision use of Law in particular.  Possibly the exact occasions you pick to Lawfully track down somebody to kill them is, perhaps, a relatively advanced topic, especially in Golarion which is full of situations that dath ilan would usually keep inside the 'counterfactuals'.  People are taking the things I said and deriving further conclusions from them that strike me as worryingly not what I was trying to say."

"Possibly people should stick with their sensible instincts or educated heuristics, rather than generating sentences which sound sort of like stuff I've said about Law, and doing that."

"If you seem to have carefully reasoned out that you ought to destroy the universe, but it also seems to you that there's a better thing you could do instead of the Lawful thing, which is not destroying the universe, maybe you should hold off on trying to be quote Lawful unquote for that exact minute.  This stuff is supposed to make sense; if at any point it's advising you to do terrible things that don't feel like they make sense - I can't say it's certain that you're wrong, for reversed stupidity is not intelligence.  But I am certain that you didn't achieve a reliable understanding and internalization of the Law.  Any time the Law doesn't feel like it makes sense, you definitely don't have the kind of understanding of it that you can trust."

"Only destroy the universe if you have a carefully Lawful line of reasoning saying to do that, and you can take a step back from all the careful reasoning and grasp the whole thing intuitively and it totally makes sense why you'd do that, and that doesn't feel at all strained or like you're sweeping key issues under the rug.  If you don't have the 'introspection' - if you don't have the Wisdom to confidently evaluate that level of strainedness, then you should back off the whole thing and leave destroy-the-universe decisions to somebody else..."

"You know, let's just simplify that line of reasoning," it's hard to remember that everyone here is effectively six years old, in some ways if not others.  "Everyone here should just not destroy the universe, period.  Don't complicate it any more than that until you're much much much better at Law, and can be very sure that you're correct to ignore my flat instruction not to do that.  Like, maybe Asmodia in a few years could decide that if someone had to, but everyone else should just not do it."