"I think you're simultaneously asking the question of 'What if I actually get destroyed' and 'What if Asmodeus falsely believes I won't get destroyed', rather than forming the hypothetical 'What if I don't get destroyed and Asmodeus correctly believes I won't get destroyed' which is the one I was trying to point to there. Possibly on account of you having some trouble with lending temporary consideration to the hypothetical 'What if I don't get destroyed', since spending too much time thinking about it might cause you to come to an incorrect answer and get destroyed, if you don't consider yourself to have earned trust in your own validity. All I can really say to you is that I'd expect Keepers and Asmodeus not to make mistakes about that, so asking what if they strongly believe something should be the same as asking what if it's true."
| Version: 1 | |
|---|---|
| Fields Changed | (Original) |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
|
| Version: 2 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
"I think you're simultaneously asking the question of 'What if I actually get destroyed' and 'What if Asmodeus falsely believes I won't get destroyed', rather than forming the hypothetical 'What if I don't get destroyed and Asmodeus correctly believes I won't get destroyed' which is the one I was trying to point to there. Possibly on account of you having some trouble with lending temporary consideration to the hypothetical 'What if I don't get destroyed', since spending too much time thinking about it might cause you to come to an incorrect answer and then get actually destroyed, if you don't feel yourself to have earned trust in your own validity and are afraid of becoming mistaken. But I'd expect Keepers and Asmodeus not to make mistakes about that, so asking what if they strongly believe something should be the same as asking what if it's true." |