Edit History (Oldest to Newest)
Version: 1
Fields Changed (Original)
Updated
Content

"To answer the question," drawls Alexandre, looking up from his scribbled notes, "if we assume that 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 all start with equal prior likelihoods, it's (729/100000 +  2048/100000 + 3456/100000), divided by three because there are three equal possibilities, compared to (2304/100000 + 512/100000 + 81/100000) divided by three, gives you -" (he's been doing calculations while Willa talks) "- roughly two hundred seventy over one hundred thousand, as opposed to a little under seven hundred over one hundred thousand, giving you a ratio of a little under three to one in favor of the first bucket of theories against the second bucket."

Version: 2
Fields Changed Content
Updated
Content

"To answer the question," drawls Alexandre, looking up from his scribbled notes, "if we assume that 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 all start with equal prior likelihoods, and similarly for 0.6, 0.8, and 0.9 it's (729/100000 +  2048/100000 + 3456/100000), divided by three because there are three equal possibilities, compared to (2304/100000 + 512/100000 + 81/100000) divided by three, gives you -" (he's been doing calculations while Willa talks) "- roughly two hundred seventy over one hundred thousand, as opposed to a little under seven hundred over one hundred thousand, giving you a ratio of a little under three to one in favor of the first bucket of theories against the second bucket."

Version: 3
Fields Changed Content
Updated
Content

"To answer the question," drawls Alexandre, looking up from his scribbled notes, "if we assume that 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 all start with equal prior likelihoods, and similarly for 0.6, 0.8, and 0.9 it's (729/100000 +  2048/100000 + 3456/100000), divided by three because there are three equal possibilities, compared to (2304/100000 + 512/100000 + 81/100000) divided by three, gives you -" (he's been doing calculations while Willa talks) "- roughly two thousand seventy over one hundred thousand, as opposed to a little under seven hundred over one hundred thousand, giving you a ratio of a little under three to one in favor of the first bucket of theories against the second bucket."

Version: 4
Fields Changed Content
Updated
Content

"To answer the question," drawls Alexandre, looking up from his scribbled notes, "if we assume that 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 all start with equal prior likelihoods, and similarly for 0.6, 0.8, and 0.9, it's (729/100000 +  2048/100000 + 3456/100000), divided by three because there are three equal possibilities, compared to (2304/100000 + 512/100000 + 81/100000) divided by three for the same reason, gives you -" (he's been doing calculations while Willa talks) "- roughly two thousand seventy over one hundred thousand, as opposed to a little under seven hundred over one hundred thousand, giving you a ratio of a little under three to one in favor of the first bucket of theories against the second bucket."

Version: 5
Fields Changed Content
Updated
Content

"To answer the question," drawls Alexandre, looking up from his scribbled notes, "if we assume that 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 all start with equal prior likelihoods, and similarly for 0.6, 0.8, and 0.9, it's (729/100000 +  2048/100000 + 3456/100000), divided by three because there are three equal possibilities, compared to (2304/100000 + 512/100000 + 81/100000) divided by three for the same reason, gives you -" (he's been doing calculations while Willa talks) "- roughly two thousand seventy over one hundred thousand, as opposed to a little under seven hundred over one hundred thousand, giving you a ratio of a little under three to one in favor of the first bucket of theories against the second bucket."

 

 

Wait no that's obviously wrong oh damn it -