Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of the other Counts who didn't go quietly.
| Version: 1 | |
|---|---|
| Fields Changed | (Original) |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
|
| Version: 2 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of any extra-'extractive' Counts who didn't go quietly. |
| Version: 3 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of any extra-'extractive' Counts who didn't go quietly. Keltham does remember how all coalitions are unstable because a subcoalition can kick somebody out and redivide that person's gains among themselves, if for some odd reason they're not using logical decision theory. |
| Version: 4 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of any extra-'extractive' Counts who didn't go quietly. Keltham does remember how all coalitions are unstable because a subcoalition can kick somebody out and redivide that person's gains among themselves - if for some odd reason they're not using logical decision theory, that is. |
| Version: 5 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of any extra-'extractive' Counts who didn't go quietly. Keltham does remember how all majority-ruled coalitions would be theoretically unstable because a subcoalition could kick somebody out and redivide that person's gains among themselves - if for some odd reason they weren't using logical decision theory, that is. |
| Version: 6 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of any extra-'extractive' Counts who didn't go quietly. Keltham does remember how all majoritarian coalitions should be theoretically unstable because a subcoalition could kick somebody out and redivide that person's gains among themselves - if for some odd reason they weren't using logical decision theory, that is. |
| Version: 7 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
Well, if they don't tell any other Counts about it, maybe they can have some of the ill-gotten stuff of any extra-'extractive' Counts who didn't go quietly. Keltham does remember how all majoritarian coalitions are theoretically unstable because a subcoalition could kick somebody out and redivide that person's gains among themselves - if for some odd reason they weren't using logical decision theory, that is. |