They will inevitably SLACK OFF making this project DOOMED TO FAILURE. Wasn't that the whole reason why land plots got tagged with people in the first place? Carissa isn't being consistent here in what she claims will go wrong! She only says things will go wrong with Keltham's ideas and not that the same things will go wrong with her ideas! How unfair!
Edit History (Oldest to Newest)
| Version: 1 | |
|---|---|
| Fields Changed | (Original) |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
|
| Version: 2 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
They will inevitably SLACK OFF making this project DOOMED TO FAILURE. Wasn't that the whole reason why land plots got tagged with people in the first place? Carissa isn't being consistent here in what she claims will go wrong! She only says things will go wrong with Keltham's ideas and not that the same things will go wrong with her ideas! How 'epistemically-unfair'! |
| Version: 3 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
They will inevitably SLACK OFF making this project DOOMED TO FAILURE. Wasn't that the whole reason why land plots got tagged with people in the first place? Carissa isn't being consistent here in what she claims will go wrong! She only says things will go wrong with Keltham's ideas, and not that the same things will go wrong with her ideas! What an 'epistemically-unfair' way of arguing for 'relative-attractiveness-of-policy judgments'! |