"So would you agree that this scoring function..."

"Gives you more points, or rather, has you lose fewer 2s, the more probability you assign to whatever happened?"

"That it gives you the same final number of points, or 2s lost, whether you're predicting two coinspins at once, or predicting them separately?"

"And that, at least in this particular example we checked, it wasn't possible to expect to score more average points, or lose fewer 2s, by giving an answer other than reality's answer for how often something happens?"

"So would you agree that this scoring function..."

"Gives you more points, or rather, has you lose fewer 2s, the more probability you assign to whatever happened?"

"Gives you the same final number of points, or 2s lost, whether you're predicting two coinspins at once, or predicting them separately?"

"And, at least in this particular example we checked, it wasn't possible to expect to score more average points, or lose fewer 2s, by giving an answer other than reality's answer for how often something happens?"

"So would you agree that this scoring function..."

"Gives you more points, or rather, has you lose fewer 2s, the more probability you assign to whatever happened?"

"Gives you the same final number of points, or 2s lost, whether you're predicting two coinspins at once, or predicting them separately in different rounds?"

"And, at least in this particular example we checked, it wasn't possible to expect to score more average points, or lose fewer 2s, by giving an answer other than reality's answer for how often something happens?"