"Oh, at the moment, we don't have any technical definition of what fairness is, really, just this one permutation-based formula I gave you which I claimed might have something to do with fair answers, and four particular properties that might seem intuitively appealing for a fair solution. So at present, we could at best say that the permutation-based formula doesn't split rewards evenly; and that splitting rewards evenly violates the intuitively appealing notion that zero marginal production should receive zero reward."
Edit History (Oldest to Newest)
| Version: 1 | |
|---|---|
| Fields Changed | (Original) |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
|
| Version: 2 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
"Oh, at the moment, we don't have any technical definition of what fairness is, really, just this one permutation-based formula I gave you which I claimed might have something to do with fairness, and four particular properties that might seem intuitively appealing for a fair solution. So at present, we could at best say that the supposedly fair permutation-based formula doesn't split rewards evenly; and that splitting rewards evenly violates the intuitively-appealing fair notion that zero marginal production should receive zero reward." |