Edit History (Oldest to Newest)
Version: 1
Fields Changed (Original)
Updated
Content

"If I imagine trying to negotiate a 256-page merger between two large companies, with 1024 clauses, I can't actually see how the Golarion method would scale, if you don't know about explicit acceptance probabilities.  Every time you wanted to negotiate one clause, you'd need to be ready to walk away otherwise, staking 100% of the success probability, because otherwise they don't have any incentive to give in.  But there's no way that would scale across 1024 clauses without triggering once... maybe the walk-away claims are mostly bluffs, but the other side isn't sure you're bluffing each time they call it?  Does Golarion just not do large complicated contracts by dath ilani standards, or..."

Version: 2
Fields Changed Content
Updated
Content

"If I imagine trying to negotiate a 256-page merger between two large companies, with 1024 clauses, I can't actually see how the Golarion method would scale, if you don't know about explicit acceptance probabilities.  Every time you wanted to negotiate one clause, you'd need to be ready to walk away otherwise, staking 100% of the success probability, because otherwise they don't have any incentive to give in.  But there's no way that would scale across 1024 clauses without triggering once... maybe the walk-away claims are mostly bluffs," wow, what a concept to have a single-syllable word for, "but the other side isn't sure you're bluffing each time they call it?  Does Golarion just not do large complicated contracts by dath ilani standards, or..."