"Progress. But '~0' isn't a thing in this language, 'not' takes in propositions, which have the values of truth or falsehood, and spits out falsehood or truth. 'Not four' isn't a number - or if you wanted it to talk about all the numbers except four, we'd have to start introducing collections and that's a big ol' subject. ~= isn't already symbol in our language either, and in fact you don't particularly need to define a new symbol for it. Next rewrite?"
| Version: 1 | |
|---|---|
| Fields Changed | (Original) |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
|
| Version: 2 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
"Progress. But '~0' isn't a thing in this language, 'not' takes in propositions, which have the values of truth or falsehood, and spits out falsehood or truth. 'Not four' isn't a number - or if you wanted it to talk about all the numbers except four, we'd have to start introducing collections and that's a big ol' subject. ~= isn't already a symbol in our language either, and in fact you don't particularly need to define a new symbol for it. Next rewrite?" |
| Version: 3 | |
| Fields Changed | Content |
| Updated | |
| Content |
lawful chaotic
"Progress. But '~0' isn't a thing in this language, 'not' takes in propositions, which have the values of truth or falsehood, and spits out falsehood or truth. 'Not four' isn't a number - or if you wanted it to talk about the collection of all numbers except four, we'd have to start introducing collections and that's a big ol' subject. ~= isn't already a symbol in our language either, and in fact you don't particularly need to define a new symbol for it. Next rewrite?" |