"With the exception of falling far enough off the multi-agent boundary to end up in direct value-destroy conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."

"With the exception of falling far enough off the multi-agent boundary to end up in direct multiagent-value-destructive conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."

"With the exception of falling far enough off the multi-agent optimality boundary to end up in direct multiagent-value-destructive conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."

"With the exception of falling far enough off the multi-agent optimality boundary to end up in direct multiagent-value-destructive conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has epistemically based political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."

"With the exception of falling far enough off the multi-agent optimality boundary to end up in direct multiagent-value-destructive conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has epistemically-based political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."

"With the exception of falling far enough off the multi-agent optimality boundary to end up in direct multiagent-value-destroying conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has epistemically-based political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."

"With the exception of falling far enough off the multiagent-optimal boundary to end up in multiagent-value-destroying conflict, it seems hard to blame them for that?  If you had disagreements about superpowerful beings watching everything your civilization was doing, that would be a very reasonable thing to form political factions about.  Even dath ilan currently has epistemically-based political factions instead of being able to apply theorems about no common knowledge of disagreement, embarrassing as that may be."