All right, step one worked.  Now it's time for SCIENCE.  If she wants to actually do this correctly instead of turning into Science Maniac Verrez, she should probably actually list out all the anomalies and questions worth investigating, before she starts; then pick a first target based on its tractability X importance, instead of blindly maximizing one or the other; then try to come up with her own hypothesis before she starts looking at the data, so she knows what it is that she's learning and where her prior theoretical mistakes were.

All right, step one worked.  Now it's time for THINKING.  If she wants to actually do this correctly instead of turning into Science Maniac Verrez, she should probably actually list out all the anomalies and questions worth investigating, before she starts; then pick a first target based on its tractability X importance, instead of blindly maximizing one or the other; then try to come up with her own hypothesis before she starts looking at the data, so she knows what it is that she's learning and where her prior theoretical mistakes were.

All right, step one worked.  Now it's time for THINKING.  If she wants to actually do this correctly instead of turning into Science Maniac Verrez, she should actually list out all the anomalies and questions worth investigating, before she starts; then pick a first target based on its tractability X importance, instead of blindly maximizing one or the other; then try to come up with her own hypothesis before she starts looking at the data, so she knows what it is that she's learning and where her prior theoretical mistakes were.